Ex Parte CARLONI et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today        
                    was not written for publication and is not binding                
                    precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                 Paper No. 35         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                     Ex parte MANUEL J. CARLONI, MICHAEL J. GANS,                     
                       REINALDO VALENZUELA, and JACK H. WINTERS                       
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2001-1601                                 
                              Application No. 08/404,406                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before THOMAS, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 12, 16, 17, and 19 through 29.                
          Claims 13 through 15 have been canceled, and on page 2 of the               
          Brief, appellants canceled claim 18 from further prosecution.               
               Appellants' invention relates to a wireless communication              
          system with multiple antenna elements at both the transmitter and           
          the receiver, wherein the antenna elements at both locations                
          point in plural azimuthal and plural elevational directions.                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007