Ex Parte CARLONI et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-1601                                                        
          Application No. 08/404,406                                                  

          Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as           
          follows:                                                                    
               1.  A wireless communications device for indoor                        
          communications comprising:                                                  
               a plurality of first antenna elements for receiving a                  
          plurality of outbound signals on multiple receive antenna beams             
          pointing in both plural respective azimuthal and plural                     
          respective elevational directions wherein each said outbound                
          signal is transmitted from a second plurality of antenna elements           
          on a different one of a plurality of outbound antenna beams, said           
          second antenna elements pointing in different azimuthal and                 
          elevational directions to facilitate said indoor communications             
          in a multipath indoor environment; and                                      
               a first processor operatively connected to the first antenna           
          elements and responsive to said received outbound signals for               
          determining a suitable indoor communications path between at                
          least one of the first antenna elements and at least one of the             
          second antenna elements with respect to predetermined                       
          communications conditions.                                                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Graziano                 4,128,740                Dec. 05, 1978             
          Vasile                   5,089,823                Feb. 18, 1992             
          Freeburg                 5,095,535                Mar. 10, 1992             
          Borras et al. (Borras)   5,303,240                Apr. 12, 1994             
          Harbin et al. (Harbin)   5,701,583                Dec. 23, 1997             
               Claims 1 through 5, 7, 8, 12, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 29               
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             
          Freeburg in view of Harbin.                                                 
               Claims 6 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                
          being unpatentable over Freeburg in view of Harbin and Borras.              
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007