Ex Parte LABORDE - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-0859                                                         
          Application 09/193,444                                                       


          As redundancy, a further channel 220 couples the bottom node 210             
          to another node upstream, which may be a surface device, for                 
          example.  See page 4 of Appellant’s specification.                           
               Independent claim 1 present in the application is                       
          representative of the claimed invention and is reproduced as                 
          follows:                                                                     
               1.  A system for use in a well having completion zones,                 
          comprising:                                                                  
               a surface node;                                                         
               a plurality of downhole nodes positioned in the completion              
          zones; and                                                                   
               a communications link extending into the well and coupled to            
          the surface node and downhole nodes, the communications link                 
          including channels coupling successive nodes, the surface node               
          and downhole nodes coupled in a loop by the channels.                        
                                   References                                          
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                
               Gerstel et al. (Gerstel)       5,793,746      Aug. 11, 1998             
               Tubel et al. (Tubel)           5,959,547      Sep. 28, 1999             
          (Filed Sep. 17, 1997)                                                        
                              Rejection at Issue                                       
               Claims 1 through 10, 12 through 16, 18 through 24, and 26               
          through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     
          unpatentable over Tubel in view of Gerstel.                                  



                                           3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007