Ex Parte LABORDE - Page 8




          Appeal No. 2002-0859                                                         
          Application 09/193,444                                                       


          that teaches the advantages of using a ring over the advantages              
          of using a bus communication system.  Therefore, we fail to find             
          that the Examiner has provided substantial evidence as to why one            
          of ordinary skill in the art would make the proposed combination             
          of substituting Tubel’s reliable bus communication system with               
          Gerstel’s ring communication system.                                         
               In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the                     
          Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 10, 12 through 16,                  
          18 through 24, and 26 through 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                      
                                   REVERSED                                            





                         MICHAEL R. FLEMING             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         JOSEPH L. DIXON                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )   APPEALS AND                
                                                        )                              
                                                        ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                        )                              
                         MAHSHID SAADAT                 )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              

          MRF:pgc                                                                      



                                           8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007