The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AMIT GUPTA and RAPHAEL ROM
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1383
Application No. 08/868,972
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before DIXON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection
of claims 1, 2, 6-19, and 21-30.
We affirm-in-part.
1 Appellants waived an oral hearing via facsimile communication filed December 18, 2002 (Paper
No. 16).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007