The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YI-SHUNG CHAUG
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1397
Application No. 09/310,800
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3-6, 8-10, and 19-29.
We reverse, and enter new a new ground of rejection in accordance with 37 CFR
§ 1.196(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007