Appeal No. 2002-1491
Application 08/845,526
Gharachorloo et al. (“Gharachorloo”) 5,488,684 January 30, 1996
Schulmeiss 5,717,847 February 10, 1998
Jia et al. (“Jia”) 5,726,896 March 10, 1998
Sherman et al. (“Sherman”) 5,734,756 March 31, 1998
The Rejections on Appeal
Claims 1, 2, 6, 8 and 13-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Jia, Gharachorloo, Luken, and Schulmeiss.
Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jia,
Gharachorloo, Luken, Schulmeiss, and Sherman.
Claims 9 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Luken,
Jia, Schulmeiss and Sherman (Answer at 2).
Claims 16, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Luken, Jia, and Schulmeiss.
Claims 20-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Luken and
Gharachorloo.
Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Luken,
Gharachorloo, and Oha.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007