Ex Parte BANSAL et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1755                                                        
          Application No. 09/173,286                                                  


               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.  A method for creating a message from a plurality of                
          users over a network, comprising the steps of:                              
               receiving from an originating user information for a                   
          recipient, at least one contributing user, and a first sub-                 
          message;                                                                    
               contacting said at least one contributing user;                        
               receiving a second sub-message from said at least one                  
          contributing user; and                                                      
               composing said message using said first and second sub-                
          messages;                                                                   
               wherein a universe of contributing users to which the                  
          message can be directed is restricted according to the                      
          information for at least one contributing user provided by the              
          originating user.                                                           

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Nakatsu et al. (Nakatsu)         5,787,151         Jul. 28, 1998            
          Hibbeler                         6,067,348         May  23, 2000            
               (filed Aug. 4, 1998)                                                   
          Shaw, “Microsoft Office 6 in 1”, (Microsoft Office) Que                     
          Corporation, (1994), pp. 512-539, 565-574.                                  

               Claims 1, 2, 8, 9 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 102(b) as being in public use or on sale more than one year               
          prior to applicants’ invention, as evidenced by Microsoft Office.           
               Claims 3-7, 10-16 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Microsoft           

                                         -2–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007