The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte KAREN A. PAPIERNIAK,
JAMES E. THAISZ, LUO-JEN CHIANG,
SUSAN L. WOODFORD,
and EUGENE M. BETZ
Appeal No. 2002-1844
Application 08/975,4281
ON BRIEF
Before BARRETT, SAADAT, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1, 3-22, 28-35, and 37.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed November 20, 1997, entitled
"Computer Architecture and Method for Supporting and Analyzing
Electronic Commerce over the World Wide Web for Commerce Service
Providers And/or Internet Service Providers."
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007