The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte YOICHI TAKAGI,
HIROSHI SUZUKI, KUNIZO SAKAI,
YOSHIKI KOBAYASHI and
TAKESHI SAITO
______________
Appeal No. 2002-1940
Application 08/932,649
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 1-3, 15, 16, 24 and 25. Representative
claim 1 is reproduced below:
1. An intruder monitoring apparatus monitoring a wide are
by changing a camera shooting direction comprising:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007