The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TERRY LEE LEASURE, GEORGE McNEIL LATTIMORE,
ROBERT ANTHONY ROSS, Jr. and GUS WAI YAN YEUNG
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1994
Application No. 09/364,4491
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, BLANKENSHIP and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 4-8, 11, 14, 15, 17 and 18. Claims 1-3 and
10 have been canceled. Claims 9, 12, 13, 16, 19-29, which are
all the other claims pending in this application, are indicated
by the Examiner as being allowable.2
We affirm.
1 Application for patent filed July 30, 1999.
2 See the Examiner’s answer, pages 2 and 9.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007