Appeal No. 2002-2106 Application 09/313,359 Nakano discloses a communications system in which the exchange station notifies the base station of a transmission power value, and that the base station corrects its transmission power to match the notified transmission power value. The exchange station sets this notified transmission value based upon the comparison of the transmission power values reported from the base stations. The Examiner points to Nakano, column 18, line 66, through column 19, line 17. The Examiner argues that the notified transmission power value reads on the Appellants’ claimed presettable target value because the notified power value is set before it is transmitted to the base station and used to correct transmission power. See page 4 of the Examiner’s answer. As our reviewing court states, “[t]he terms used in the claims bear a “heavy presumption” that they mean what they say and have the ordinary meaning that would be attributed to those words by persons skilled in the relevant art.” Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1202, 64 USPQ2d 1812, 1817 (Fed. Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S.Ct. 2230 (2003). “Moreover, the intrinsic record also must be examined in every case to determine whether the presumption of ordinary and 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007