Appeal No. 2002-2106
Application 09/313,359
described above. See Nakano, column 18, lines 51-56. Further-
more, Nakano teaches that the seventh specific embodiment
configurations of the mobile station and the base station are
substantially similar to those of Figs. 18 and 19 described
above, but it is assumed that the base station control station 11
is functionally integrated into the exchange station 7 so that
the control with respect to the base station control station
function is to be realized by the control with respect to the
exchange station. See Nakano, column 18, lines 57-64. Nakano
teaches that the control signal (transmission power control
command) is sent from the mobile unit first before correcting the
transmission power of each of the base stations according to the
seventh embodiment. See column 11, line 62, through column 12,
line 30. Therefore, we fail to find that the Examiner properly
found that Nakano’s “notified transmission power value” reads on
Appellants’ claimed invention.
Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. § 103
For the rejections of claims 3, 4 and 7 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103, we note that the Examiner has relied on Nakano for the
teaching of “presettable target values” as recited in Appellants’
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007