Appeal No. 2002-2106 Application 09/313,359 claims. Upon our review of Kumar and Ozluturk, we fail to find that these references teach this limitation. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for the same reasons as set forth above. In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 9 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. Furthermore, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 3, 4 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) MRF:psb 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007