The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HENRIK FEGESH
__________
Appeal No. 2002-2239
Application No. 08/876,450
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before SCHAFER, LEE and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-6, which are all of the pending claims of
this application.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM
The appellant has indicated (Brief, page 3) that, for the
purposes of this appeal, claims 2, 4, and 6 will stand or fall
together with claim 1, while claims 3 and 5 stand apart. Claims
1, 3, and 5 (with any intervening claims) read as follow:
1. An arrangement for producing television contributions in
a studio or in a mobile unit, comprising:
at least one picture signal source; devices for processing
the picture signals; and outputs for the processed picture
signals,
characterized in that the arrangement further comprises:
a central operation unit for accommodating the individual
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007