Ex Parte FEGESH - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2002-2239                                                          
          Application No. 08/876,450                                                    
          unpatentable over Esch.                                                       
               Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being                 
          unpatentable over Esch in view of Ritter.                                     
                                      The Invention                                     
               The invention relates to an arrangement for producing                    
          television contributions in a studio or in a mobile unit from a               
          plurality of simultaneously available signal sources utilizing at             
          least one picture signal source, devices for processing the                   
          picture signals, and outputs for the processed picture signals.               
          (Specification, page 1, lines 2-8).  Further details of the                   
          claimed invention are recited in claims 1, 3, 4, and 5 reproduced             
          above.                                                                        
              The Rejection of Claims 1, 2, and 4 Under 35 U.S.C. §102(b)               
               The examiner has found that Esch discloses at least one                  
          picture signal source, outputs for the processed signals, a                   
          central operating unit, and a controllable switching device having            
          outputs connected to the inputs of the picture signal processing              
          devices and having inputs connected to the outputs of the signal              
          processing devices  (Page 4, lines 1-7).                                      
               The appellant urges that “[n]owhere within the four corners              
          of Esch can this inventive configuration be found or suggested”               
          (Appeal Brief, page 4, lines 9-11).                                           
               Claim 1 requires a central operation unit for accommodating              
          the individual picture signal-processing devices as independent               
          units; and a controllable switching device having outputs                     
          connected to the inputs of the picture signal-processing devices              
          enabling free allocation of the picture signal-processing devices             
          to the at least one picture signal source and having inputs                   
          connected to the outputs of the picture signal processing device.             
                                           3                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007