Appeal No. 2003-0008 Application No. 09/174,936 decode stage of the pipelined processor and instructions with false predicates are annulled before they are processed by subsequent stages. According to Appellants (specification, pages 5 and 6), by eliminating unnecessary processing of false predicate instructions in the later pipeline stages, such as the execute and write-back stages which typically consume the most power, the power consumption of the processor can be reduced. Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows: 1. A method of processing instructions in a processing system, the method comprising the steps of: evaluating a predicate of a predicated instruction in a decode stage of a pipelined processor of the system; and annulling the predicated instruction in the decode stage if the predicate has a particular value. The Examiner relies on the following prior art: Martell 5,761,476 Jun. 02, 1998 Shiell et al. (Shiell) 5,799,180 Aug. 25, 1998 Claims 1-4, 6-13, and 15-20, all of the appealed claims, stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Martell in view of Shiell. Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 14 and the Answer (Paper No. 15) for the respective details. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007