Ex Parte WU et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0237                                                        
          Application No. 09/157,895                                                  

          a printer device.  Claim 1, directed toward the computer system,            
          is illustrative:                                                            
          1.        A computer system for outputting data to an output                
          device, comprising:                                                         
               an application program for invoking a plurality of graphics            
          device interface functions to control the sending of data to the            
          output device;                                                              
               a graphics device interface for invoking a plurality of                
          device driver functions for controlling the outputting of data in           
          response to the invocation of the plurality of graphics device              
          interface functions;                                                        
               a text based minidriver containing a text based                        
          characterization of the output device, the text based                       
          characterization containing an implementation of device specific            
          device driver functions invoked by the graphic device interface,            
          the text based minidriver including means for outputting the text           
          based characterization; and                                                 
               a modular universal driver which incorporates the text based           
          characterization passed by the text based minidriver, the modular           
          universal driver implementing the device specific driver                    
          functions to control the outputting of data to the output device            
          in accordance with the incorporated text based characterization.            
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Shaw et al. (Shaw)               5,604,843         Feb. 18, 1997            
          Millman et al. (Millman)         5,619,635         Apr.  8, 1997            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1-4 and 6-17              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Shaw, and claims 18-22           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Shaw in view of Millman.              





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007