Appeal No. 2003-0237
Application No. 09/157,895
and/or installing the print driver (fig. 4 and col. 5, lines 44-
60)” (answer, page 13).
The examiner relies upon Millman for a disclosure of a text
editor, but the portion of Millman cited by the examiner does not
disclose that the editor used to modify the print driver is a
text editor. Also, the examiner has not explained how Millman
would have fairly suggested a text editor to one of ordinary
skill in the art. Furthermore, as discussed above regarding the
rejection of claims 1 and 11, the examiner relies upon Shaw for a
disclosure of a text based minidriver, but the examiner has not
pointed out where a text based minidriver is disclosed by Shaw.
Nor has the examiner explained how Shaw would have fairly
suggested a text based minidriver to one of ordinary skill in the
art. Thus, the examiner clearly has not established that the
applied references would have fairly suggested, to one of
ordinary skill in the art, using a text editor to create or
modify a text based minidriver.
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 18 and 20
and claims 19, 21 and 22 that depend therefrom.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007