Ex Parte KOBAYASHI - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0522                                                        
          Application No. 09/324,237                                                  
               1.   A harmonic mixer comprising:                                      
               a pair of complementary transistors coupled together;                  
               an input port; and                                                     
               an output port.                                                        
               The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                  
               Cerny, Jr. et al. (Cerny)     4,193,036      Mar. 11, 1980             
               Claims 1, 2, 8, 10, 11, 26 and 27 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Cerny.  This rejection is              
          noted at the top of page 3 of the answer where the examiner makes           
          reference to the statement of the rejection in the final                    
          rejection, Paper No. 7, for the details of this rejection.                  
               We note here that the additional rejection of the remaining            
          claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over this reference to               
          Cerny has not be stated by the examiner to have been maintained             
          in the answer.  Therefore, since the examiner has not maintained            
          the rejection of the remaining claims on appeal, claims 9, 12               
          through 14, 21 through 25 and 28 through 30, the rejection of               
          them under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in the final rejection  is considered            
          to have been withdrawn, either intentionally or inadvertently.              
               Rather that repeat the details of the examiner’s positions,            
          reference is made to the final rejection and the answer for the             
          examiner’s positions and to the brief for appellant’s positions.            

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007