Ex Parte KOBAYASHI - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2003-0522                                                        
          Application No. 09/324,237                                                  
               complementary [ELECTR] Having pnp and npn or p- and n–                 
               channel semiconductor elements on or within the same                   
               integrated-circuit substrate or working together in the                
               same functional amplifier state.                                       
               complementary transistors [ELECTR] Two transistors of                  
               opposite conductivity (pnp and npn)in the same                         
               functional unit.                                                       
                                                                                     
               The initial circuit in Fig. 1 of Cerny relates to his                  
          balanced active mixer circuit 101 which is modified in various              
          minor forms in the succeeding Figs. 2 through 5.  Transistors               
          120, 121 relied upon by the examiner, such as in initial Figs. 1            
          through 3, are both NPN transistors and thus would not be                   
          considered to be complementary transistors in the art.                      
          Additionally, the embodiment in Cerny’s Figs. 4 and 5 relate to             
          FET transistors rather than the bipolar transistors of the same             
          conductivity type in Figs. 1 through 3.  Since these transistors            
          in Figs. 4 and 5 of Cerny are of the same transistor type, they             
          are not considered by the artisan as complementary transistors.             
               In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner                 
          rejecting various claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is                 
          reversed.                                                                   
               Under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.196(b) all of the pending             
          claims 1, 2, 8 through 14 and 20 through 30 are rejected under              
          the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being vague and                  
          indefinite.  This rule permits us to reject any pending claim.              
                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007