Ex Parte KOBAYASHI - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2003-0522                                                        
          Application No. 09/324,237                                                  
          but it is surmised that this term refers to the previously                  
          recited output port.  The other independent claims on appeal                
          reflect similar problems and indefiniteness.                                
               In summary, we have reversed the examiner’s rejection of               
          various claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102.  We have also               
          instituted a new ground of rejection under the second paragraph             
          of 35 U.S.C. § 112 of all pending claims, claim 1, 2, 8 through             
          14 and 20 through 30.                                                       
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground           
          of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of                  
          judicial review.”                                                           
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN             
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of              
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as to            
          the rejected claims:                                                        
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims                 
               so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                      
               claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                       
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    



                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007