Ex Parte KOLEV et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-0705                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/144,024                                                                                  


              can receive only the high power signals, and cannot communicate with the first device                       
              along a return low-power channel.                                                                           
                     Representative independent claim 23 is reproduced as follows:                                        
                     23.  A method for communicating a call-type in a satellite radio-communication                       
              system wherein a mobile radio-communication device is operating in a disadvantaged                          
              mode, the method comprising:                                                                                
                     transmitting a paging message including a designation of the call-type;                              
                     wherein the paging message further comprises a first string designating a                            
              request for a communication corresponding to the call-type and the communication is to                      
              take place when the mobile radio-communication device is operating in an advantaged                         
              mode in which two-way communication is possible.                                                            
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                     
                     Thompson                     5,465,401                   Nov. 7, 1995                                
                     Foladare et al. (Foladare) 5,894,595                     Apr. 13, 1999                               
                                                                       (filed Feb. 21, 1997)                              
                     Helferich                    6,087,956                   Jul. 11, 2000                               
                                                                       (filed Sep. 19, 1997)                              
                     Claims 1, 3-5, 7-13, 17-19, 23, 25, 27, 29-31, 34 and 36-43 stand rejected under                     
              35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Helferich and                             
              Thompson with regard to claims 1, 3-5, 7-13, 17-19, 23, 25, 27, 29-31 and 34.  The                          
              examiner offers Foladare and Helferich with regard to claims 36-43.                                         
                     Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of                           
              appellants and the examiner.                                                                                


                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007