The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte JOSEPH D. SMITH, AUSTIN L. HIGGS and THIEG K. NGUYEN _____________ Appeal No. 2003-0768 Application No. 09/396,287 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, BARRY and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 14-27, 29, 30 and 33-37. Claims 1-13, 28 and 32 have been indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter and are no longer part of this appeal. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007