Ex Parte COHEN et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-0977                                                        
          Application No. 09/219,995                                                  

               Claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention and is              
          reproduced as follows:                                                      
          1.   A method of controlling a selection process for                        
          communications in a call center, the method comprising the steps            
          of:                                                                         
               associating at least one category of levels with a plurality           
          of skills supported by a given agent in the call center, the                
          category including a level for each of at least a subset of the             
          plurality of skills; and                                                    
               selecting a communication for handling by the agent based at           
          least in part on a computation involving at least one of the                
          levels.                                                                     
                                     References                                       
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
          Bogart et al. (Bogart)        6,163,607           Dec. 19, 2000             
                                             (filed Nov.  3, 1998)                    
                                 Rejections At Issue                                  
               Claims 1-8, 11-19, and 22-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 102 as being anticipated by Bogart.                                       
               Throughout our opinion, we make references to the                      
          Appellants' briefs, and to the Examiner's Answer for the                    
          respective details thereof.1                                                




          1  Appellants filed an appeal brief on June 25, 2002.  Appellants           
          filed a reply brief on November 4, 2002.  The Examiner mailed out           
          an Examiner's Answer on August 27, 2002.                                    
                                          3                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007