The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HEATH HUNNICUT and JOHN F. LUDEMAN ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1025 Application No. 09/224,918 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before SMITH, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7-11, 14-15, 17-25, and 28-49. Claims 2, 6, 12, 13, 16, 26, and 27 have been canceled. Invention Appellants' invention relates to the control of access by users of the resources on a server. When a user is granted access to a resource by an access granting process, an access-permission is stored in a cache. On a subsequent access request by the same user for the same resource, the cache isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007