Ex Parte HUNNICUTT et al - Page 8




          Appeal No. 2003-1025                                                        
          Application No. 09/224,918                                                  


          to determine [perform the first process] [then perform the second           
          process]."                                                                  
               To determine whether claim 1 has an adequate written                   
          description, we must first determine what is being claimed.                 
          Our reviewing court states, "[t]he terms used in the claims bear            
          a 'heavy presumption' that they mean what they say and have the             
          ordinary meaning that would be attributed to those words by                 
          persons skilled in the relevant art."  Texas Digital Sys. Inc v.            
          Telegenix Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1202, 64 USPQ2d 1812, 1817 (Fed.             
          Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1058 (2003).                             
               Upon our review of Appellants' specification, we fail to               
          find any definition of the term "upon" that is different from the           
          ordinary meaning.  We find the ordinary meaning of the term                 
          "upon" is best found in the dictionary.  We note that the                   
          definition most suitable for "upon" is "on".2  In turn, we find             
          the ordinary meaning of the term "on" is best found in the                  
          dictionary.  We note that the definition most suitable for "on"             
          is "used to indicate occurrence at a given time."3                          




          2 The American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition, 1982,           
          page 1328. Copy provided to Appellant.                                      
          3 The American Heritage Dictionary, Second College Edition, 1982,           
          page 867. Copy provided to Appellant.                                       

                                          8                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007