The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANTHONY HAYDEN LINDSEY ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1236 Application No. 09/093,657 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, BLANKENSHIP and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6, 9 and 11-15. Claims 2, 7, 8 and 10 have been cancelled. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellant’s invention is directed to a system for converting a fourth generation language specification into target language source code by converting the language specification into an object oriented model of the fourth generation languagePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007