Ex Parte LINDSEY - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1236                                                        
          Application No. 09/093,657                                                  
          specification.  The model is mapped to code templates comprising            
          fragments of codes and is parsed to produce the source code in a            
          desired target language.                                                    
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.   In a computing environment, a system for converting a             
          fourth generation language specification into target language               
          source code, comprising:                                                    
               means for converting the fourth generation language                    
          specification into an object oriented model of the fourth                   
          generation language specification;                                          
               code templates comprising fragments of code;                           
               means for mapping the object oriented model to the code                
          templates; and                                                              
               means for parsing the mapped code templates to produce                 
          source code in a desired target language.                                   
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
               Garloff et al. (Garloff)      5,699,310      Dec. 16, 1997             
               Claims 1-6, 9 and 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Garloff.                                   
               We make reference to the answer (Paper No. 16, mailed                  
          June 4, 2002) for the Examiner’s complete reasoning, and to the             
          appeal brief (Paper No. 15, filed March 19, 2002) for Appellant’s           
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007