Appeal No. 2003-1236
Application No. 09/093,657
reference without focusing on whether the claimed functional
inter-relation is present among these elements.
As argued by Appellant, there is no evidence that the
program specification of Garloff is written in a fourth
generation language or its object oriented model is mapped to a
code template and parsed. Thus, Garloff does not anticipate
claim 1, nor claims 9, 11, and 12, which recite similar features.
Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-6, 9 and 11-15 under
35 U.S.C. § 102 over Garloff cannot be sustained.
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007