The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FERNANDO GONZALEZ, MIKE VIOLETTE,
NANSENG JENG, AFTAB AHMAD
and KLAUS SCHUEGRAF
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1298
Application No. 09/369,579
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative
Patent Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims
1-5, 21, 23-29, 33, 34, and 38-40.
Claims 1 and 34 are representative of the
subject matter on appeal, and are set forth below:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007