Ex Parte CHEN et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1316                                                        
          Application No. 09/430,531                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads         
          as follows:                                                                 
               1. An integrated delay locked loop circuit for write                   
          precompensation and clock recovery connected to receive source of           
          multiple clock signals, each of different relative phase,                   
          comprising:                                                                 
               a plurality of clock selection multiplexers each connected to          
          receive said multiple clock signals; and                                    
               a control circuit connected to control each of said plurality          
          of clock selection multiplexers to pass a respective selected one           
          of said multiple clock signals to a clock selection output, wherein         
          if one clock selection multiplexer of said plurality of clock               
          selection multiplexers is selected to pass a particular one of said         
          clock signals to its clock selection output, all of the remaining           
          clock selection multiplexers of said plurality of clock selection           
          multiplexers are prevented from passing said particular one of said         
          clock signals to their respective clock selection outputs.                  
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Hillis                   5,485,627                Jan. 16, 1996             
               Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as         
          being anticipated by Hillis.                                                
               Reference is made to the brief (paper number 18) and the               
          answer (paper number 19) for the respective positions of the                
          appellants and the examiner.                                                
                                        OPINION                                       
               We have carefully considered the entire record before us, and          
          we will sustain the anticipation rejection of claims 1 through 20.          


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007