Ex Parte Nakano et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1483                                                        
          Application No. 09/591,661                                                  
          quality such as spherical aberrations, coma, field curvature and            
          astigmatism.                                                                
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
                    1.   A wide-angle catoptric system comprising,                    
               successively from an object, a secondary reflecting mirror             
               having a concave surface, a primary reflecting mirror having           
               a convex surface and a tertiary reflecting mirror having a             
               concave surface wherein images are formed by reflecting a              
               luminous flux incident from the object at said primary                 
               reflecting mirror, said secondary reflecting mirror and said           
               tertiary reflecting mirror successively; and a diaphragm               
               arranged in close proximity to said primary reflecting                 
               mirror so as to have an optical axis, which is a straight              
               line connecting a curvature center of said primary                     
               reflecting mirror to a curvature center of said secondary              
               reflecting mirror, pass through a center of the diaphragm;             
               wherein said tertiary reflecting mirror has a center of                
               curvature thereof decentered from said optical axis in a               
               direction of lesser astigmatism.                                       
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:             
          Abel                          3,811,749           May  21, 1974             
          Frasher et al. (Frasher)      4,130,757           Dec. 19, 1978             
          Cook                          4,964,706           Oct. 23, 1990             
          Admitted prior art, specification pages 1 and 2 and Figure 5.               
               Claims 1-5, 9-12 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art and              
          Cook.                                                                       
               Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as              
          being unpatentable over the admitted prior art and Cook and                 
          further in view of Abel.                                                    
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007