Appeal No. 2003-1743 Page 6 Application No. 09/540,205 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968), “[t]he legal conclusion of obviousness must be supported by facts. Where the legal conclusion is not supported by facts it cannot stand” (emphasis in original; footnote omitted). The rejection of claims 22 and 23 for obviousness based on Gorman is reversed. Conclusion In conclusion, for the reasons set forth, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 through 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Gorman is reversed. REVERSED ) Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Demetra J. Mills ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007