Ex Parte Hubbell et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2003-1783                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/560,472                                                                               
                     The references are relied upon by the examiner are:                                               
              Hubbell et al. (Hubbell)           WO 98/47948                        Oct. 29, 1998                      
              Humphries, et al. (Humphries), “The use of graft copolymers to inhibit the adhesion of                   
              bacteria to solid surfaces,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 45, pp. 297-304 (1987)                      

              Claim Groupings                                                                                          
                     According to appellants, the claims do not stand or fall together and the claims                  
              should be grouped as follows: (1) claims 5, 6, 8, 12, 61 and 64; (2) claims 13 and 14; (3)               
              claims 9, 10, 15, 16 and 18, and (4) claims 20-23 and 66.  Reply Brief, page 3.   We                     
              decide this appeal with respect to the prior art rejections before us on the basis of                    
              representative claims 1, 13, 15 and 20 as designated for each of the above noted                         
              groups, respectively.   In  Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir.                    
              1991).                                                                                                   


              Grounds of Rejection                                                                                     
                     Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                         
              incomplete and omitting essential steps.                                                                 
                     Claims 5-6, 8-10, 12-18, 20-23, 61 and 64-66 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                     
              102(a) as anticipated by Hubbell.                                                                        
                     Claims 5-6, 8-10, 12-18, 20-23, 61 and 64-66 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                     
              102(b) as anticipated by Humphries.                                                                      



                                                          3                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007