Ex Parte Hubbell et al - Page 9




              Appeal No. 2003-1783                                                                                     
              Application No. 09/560,472                                                                               
              compound and all of its properties are inseparable; they are one and the same.”  If the                  
              compounds disclosed in the specification possess the property of reducing non-specific                   
              adsorption of inorganic ions, peptides, proteins, and saccharides to a surface of a                      
              device, the exact same compound disclosed in Humphries must also necessarily                             
              possess this property.  Furthermore, Humphries clearly indicates that its graft                          
              copolymers inhibit the adhesion of bacteria to solid surfaces.   Humphries, page 297.                    
                     The rejection of representative claim 5 is affirmed.   Dependent claims 6, 8, 12,                 
              61, 64 and 65 fall with representative claim 5.                                                          
                     However, independent claim 15 stands on a different footing than claim 5 and                      
              includes the limitation that the non-interactive polymer sidechain include a functional                  
              moiety.   In addition, claim 13 requires that an analyte is bound by the functional                      
              molecule in a fluid phase.  We do not find that the examiner has presented sufficient                    
              evidence or indicated where Humphries describes a functional moiety as claimed in                        
              claims 13 or 15.  The rejection of claims 13 and 14 and claims 9, 10, 15, 16 and 18,                     
              over Humphries is reversed.                                                                              
                     Likewise, we do not find the examiner has presented evidence or indicated where                   
              Humphries discloses a patterned surface in accordance with claim 20.  The rejection of                   
              claims 20-23 and 66 over Humphries is reversed.                                                          






                                                          9                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007