Ex Parte KORDINA et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                               Paper No. 32           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                          Ex parte OLLE CLAES ERIK KORDINA                            
                                         and                                          
                                MICHAEL JAMES PAISLEY                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-1852                                  
                             Application No. 09/415,402                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: March 2, 2004                                  
                                     ___________                                      
          Before WARREN, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                     
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          (2003) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4                   
          through 6, 8 through 10, 14 through 16, 18 through 24, 34                   
          through 36, 38, 40 through 42, and 48 through 50 (final Office              
          action mailed Nov. 1, 2002, paper 22).  Claim 12, the only other            
          pending claim, is not rejected.                                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007