Appeal No. 2003-1852
Application No. 09/415,402
Summary
In summary, we reverse the examiner’s rejection under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) of appealed claims 1, 4 through 6, 8 through 10,
14 through 16, 18 through 24, 38, and 40 through 42 as
unpatentable over Maeda in view of Balakrishna and Sugiyama. We
affirm, however, the rejection of appealed claims 34 through 36
and 48 through 50 as unpatentable over the same combination of
references.
The decision of the examiner is therefore affirmed in part.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007