The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YIMING ZHOU and MARK JOHN McGRATH
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1934
Application No. 08/821,320
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A patent examiner rejected claims 2-9. The appellants appeal therefrom under
35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue on appeal can be used to edit a script associated with a
video sequence. As known in the editing art, source material are edited to produce a
sequence of video clips. The sequence may comprise several clips assembled in an
1An oral hearing was waived. (Paper No. 34.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007