Ex Parte JAPUNTICH et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2003-1945                                                        
          Application No. 08/240,877                                                  

               The appellants advance the following items as evidence of              
          non-obviousness:                                                            
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Affidavit of David M. Castiglione                   
               dated and filed November 15, 1999 (part of Paper No.                   
               33) (Castiglione I)                                                    
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Affidavit of David M. Castiglione                   
               dated February 2, 2001 and filed February 12, 2001                     
               (part of Paper No. 42) (Castiglione II)                                
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Affidavit of Brian S. McGinley dated                
               June 28, 2001 and filed July 9, 2001 (Paper No. 48)                    
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Declaration of John L. Bowers dated                 
               and filed December 10, 2001 (part of Paper No. 50)                     
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Affidavit of Frank J. Fabin dated                   
               and filed December 10, 2001 (part of Paper No. 50)                     
               The 37 CFR § 1.132 Declaration of Robert Betts dated                   
               December 7, 2001 and filed June 6, 2002 (part of Paper                 
               No. 54)                                                                
                                  THE REJECTIONS                                      
               Claims 34 through 36, 38, 40 through 74 and 78 through 81              
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable               
          over Simpson in view of McKim.                                              
               Claim 37 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Simpson in view of McKim and Shindel.                     
               Attention is directed to the main, supplemental and reply              
          briefs and to the answer for the respective positions of the                



                                          4                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007