THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TINGHAO WANG, UAHA RAGHURAM and JAMES E. NULTY ____________ Appeal No. 2003-2001 Application No. 09/345,173 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-16 and 19-22, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a polysilicon layer etching method. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007