Ex Parte WANG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No.2003-2001                                                         
          Application No. 09/345,173                                                  
               1. A method comprising etching a poly-silicon layer                    
               during fabrication of an integrated circuit following                  
               a first hydrofluoric acid (HF) dip to remove surface                   
               oxides from the poly-silicon layer, an anisotropic                     
               descumming operation to remove resist material left                    
               over from a patterning operation on the poly-silicon                   
               layer and a long anisotropic breakthrough etch.                        
               In addition to alleged admitted prior art, the references of           
          record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                
          claims are:                                                                 
          Chen                          5,308,400           May 03, 1994              
          Cher et al. (Cher)            5,453,156           Sep. 26, 1995             
          Vogel et al. (Vogel)          5,631,178           May 20, 1997              
          Chung et al. (Chung)          5,930,650           Jul. 27, 1999             
                                             (filed Aug. 01, 1997)                    
               Claims 1-11 and 13-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Chung in view of Cher.  Claims            
          2-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable           
          over Chung in view of Cher and Chen.  Claims 8, 13-16, 19, 20 and           
          22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable            
          over Chung in view of Cher and alleged admitted prior art in                
          appellants’ specification.  Claims 12 and 21 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chung in view of              
          Cher and Vogel.                                                             


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007