Appeal No. 2003-2091 Page 10 Application No. 09/266,465 Summary We reverse the rejections based on the prior art because the examiner has not shown that the claimed adenoviral construct was described or would have been obvious based on Zhang. We affirm the rejection for indefiniteness, with the understanding that Appellants and the examiner have agreed on acceptable alternative language. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED IN PART WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ERIC GRIMES ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EG/jlbPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007