Ex Parte FOGAL et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-2104                                                        
          Application No. 09/422,887                                                  

          9.  A method of manufacturing a multichip module including dies,            
          comprising:                                                                 
               stacking all of said dies in a manner such that                        
                    corresponding portions of any two of said dies define             
                    respective axes, and wherein said axes define an offset           
                    angle;                                                            
               bonding wire to said dies; and                                         
               ensuring that said step of stacking all of said dies occurs            
                    with no intervening bonding step.                                 
               In the rejection of the appealed claims, the examiner relies           
          upon the following reference:                                               
          de Givry                    0,489,643               June 10, 1992           
          (European Patent Application)                                               
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method of               
          stacking a plurality of die of a semiconductor device.  The                 
          method entails defining a minimum angular offset for an upper die           
          mounted on a lower die which allows access to a bonding site on             
          the lower die.  According to appellants, "[a] minimum angle is              
          especially preferable if it is desired to stack the maximum                 
          number of dies while still ensuring clearance for the wire bonds            
          leading to each die" (page 2 of principal brief, first                      
          paragraph).                                                                 
               Appealed claims 7-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)           
          as being anticipated by de Givry.                                           


                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007