Appeal No. 2003-2104 Application No. 09/422,887 used by appellants fails to provide a substantive distinction from the multidie devices fairly described by de Givry. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) CATHERINE TIMM ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -7-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007