Appeal No. 2003-2146 Page 15 Application No. 09/546,143 Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claim 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Barbier. THE REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103: According to the examiner (Answer, page 11), Barbier “disclose a group of intermediates represented by formula III which resembles … [appellants’] claimed formula XI….” From this the examiner asserts (id.), “[w]hile Barbier et al. do not disclose the cis-configuration of compounds of formula III or its species, such form is suggested in the racemic mixture of cis- and trans- represented by formula III.” Accordingly, the examiner concludes (Answer, page 12), since 4 We also note the examiner’s statement (Answer, page 11), Barbier “do not disclose the cis- configuration of compounds of formula III or its species….”Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007