Ex Parte Matzinger et al - Page 15


                 Appeal No.  2003-2146                                                        Page 15                  
                 Application No.  09/546,143                                                                           
                        Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claim 25 under 35 U.S.C.                              
                 § 102(e) as anticipated by Barbier.                                                                   
                 THE REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103:                                                                  
                        According to the examiner (Answer, page 11), Barbier “disclose a group of                      
                 intermediates represented by formula III which resembles … [appellants’]                              
                 claimed formula XI….”  From this the examiner asserts (id.), “[w]hile Barbier et al.                  
                 do not disclose the cis-configuration of compounds of formula III or its species,                     
                 such form is suggested in the racemic mixture of cis- and trans- represented by                       
                 formula III.”  Accordingly, the examiner concludes (Answer, page 12), since                           
























                                                                                                                       
                 4 We also note the examiner’s statement (Answer, page 11), Barbier “do not disclose the cis-          
                 configuration of compounds of formula III or its species….”                                           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007