Ex Parte ELLIS - Page 9




          Appeal No.  2004-0131                                                       
          Application No.  08/462,531                                                 

          ground-contacting the outersole portion that provides an                    
          increased thickness in a sole side.  We observe that the                    
          examiner, in response to this particular explanation by                     
          appellant, does not provide a persuasive rebuttal, i.e., does not           
          explain why this would not be routine to the skilled artisan.               
          The examiner merely asserts that appellant’s figures depict a               
          sole that is not conventional and that the Stewart Declaration is           
          directed to conventional soles.  The examiner states “[i]t is not           
          clear how “conventional” knowledge can be used to modify an                 
          unconventional midsole. Answer, page 7.  The examiner discusses             
          how the midsole depicted in some of figures is shown as touching            
          the ground, and queries how a midsole would be incorporated into            
          a sole when the midsole has a bottom surface that contacts the              
          ground.  Answer, pages 7-8.   Such comments do not demonstrate              
          that it would not be routine for the skilled artisan to combine a           
          midsole and a sole in making a shoe.                                        
               We find that the specification makes clear that Figures 6,             
          29, 30, and 32 represent midsole embodiments.  Whether or not the           
          drawings do or do not include a lower line depicting the ground             
          is immaterial to this fact.  The skilled artisan understands the            
          meaning of a midsole portion of a shoe, and understands the                 
          meaning of a sole portion of a shoe.  As discussed in the Stewart           
          Declaration, paragraph 12, the skilled person need only take the            
          midsole shown in Figure 6, and insert it into the shoe sole of              
          one of figures 4-5 and 28 such that a lower ground-contacting               
          portion of the shoe sole remains, and then make the remaining               
          lower, ground contacting portion an outersole portion.                      
               On page 8 of the answer, the examiner also states that the             
          Stewart declaration is not entitled to any weight (answer page              
          8).  We disagree for the following reasons.                                 
               Firstly, the examiner refers to the case of In re Lindell,             
          385 F. 2d 453, 155 USPQ 521 (CCPA 1967), in support of his                  
                                         -9-                                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007