Appeal No. 2004-0146 Application 09/851,911 footwear for leaving a personalized imprint on wet sand, wherein a sole portion which is “at least partially transparent” includes a bottom surface with a tight matrix of projections extending therefrom, wherein each projection is removable, enabling a user to look through the sole portion and remove a subset of the projections corresponding to a desired personalized imprint. In this rejection, the examiner concedes that the footwear of Ellis, with its densely packed matrix of removable projections (e.g., Fig. 11A), has no transparent sole portions. However, the examiner points to Berger, noting transparent portions (3, 4) of the footwear sole seen therein and the benefit described in the patent of a simple and inconspicuous construction for allowing viewing through the shoe sole, so that one can regularly and accurately monitor or measure the remaining distance of the toe tips from the portion of the shoe upper adjacent to the outsole tip to see whether the shoe has become too small. From the collective teachings of the applied references, the examiner has concluded that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the shoe sole as taught by Ellis with 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007