Ex Parte Posa - Page 17




          Appeal No. 2004-0146                                                        
          Application 09/851,911                                                      



                    In addition to affirming the examiner’s rejection of              
          one or more claims, this decision contains a remand.  37 CFR                
          § 1.196(e) provides that                                                    
                    [w]henever a decision of the Board of Patent                      
                    Appeals and Interferences includes or allows                      
                    a remand, that decision shall not be con-                         
                    sidered a final decision.  When appropriate,                      
                    upon conclusion of proceedings on remand                          
                    before the examiner, the Board of Patent                          
                    Appeals and Interferences may enter an order                      
                    otherwise making its decision final.                              


                    Regarding any affirmed rejection, 37 CFR § 1.197(b)               
          provides:                                                                   
                    (b) Appellant may file a single request for                       
                    rehearing within two months from the date of                      
                    the original decision . . . .                                     


                    The effective date of the affirmance is deferred until            
          conclusion of the proceedings before the examiner unless, as a              
          mere incident to the limited proceedings, the affirmed rejection            
          is overcome.  If the proceedings before the examiner does not               
          result in allowance of the application, abandonment or a second             
          appeal, this case should be returned to the Board of Patent                 




                                          17                                          





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007