Appeal No. 2004-0316 Application 09/136,619 conventional CD descriptive material on their labels, the artisan would readily interpret the teaching at the bottom of column 1 relating to thumbnail images that are printed for photo CD would also include index information that is characteristic of descriptive information of the actual images stored in the photo array on the disk itself. Moreover, an ordinary dictionary definition of the term "index" indicates the term commonly includes a list of items and a numeric identifier or "marking" indicating where the item may be found. Thus, there are clear teachings consistent with the examiner's position that "markings for specifying images corresponding to the print images are displayed in printing together with the print images" as set forth at the end of representative independent claim 1 on appeal. In view of these conclusions, we sustain the rejection of each independent claim 1, 10, 16, and 22 on appeal and their corresponding dependent claims 3, 12, 18, and 24 within this first stated rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102. Appellant's position with respect to dependent claims 11, 17 and 23 at the bottom of page 6 of the brief, which claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and not 35 U.S.C. § 102, notes that these claims fall with their respective parent independent claims 10, 16, and 22. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007